First some facts:
- The approval procedure in general is under extreme pressure from the developer community. It is time for change…
- Apple is not making itself very popular in banning charity apps from its store.
- It is actually very discriminatory to exclude charity organizations from benefitting from the AppStore. [I even wonder if there is a the legal basis for this ban…]
What if Unicef asked Apple to publish an App?
This is what Apple could do to solve the problem:
- Allow bona fide charities to make full use of the AppStore's payment facilities (paid apps, in app payments, subscriptions)
- Come up with clear and public rules for charity organizations
- Partner with a charity watchdog. They can/must do the pre-approval and clear a charity organization based on facts, figures and the public set of Apple rules. The charity watchdog becomes the guardian for the integrity of Apple's charity apps.
- Lower the 30% rule for approved charity Apps (this way every charity App also is partly an act of Apple charity)
- Start a "Charity" category in the App Store. Instant success gratified!
That's it, that's my iDonAid plea. It really would be a brave move for Apple if they would reconsider their charity app policy and - at least - make it public. I just hope that our efforts raised the awareness that mobile donations are the way to go.
Basically:
Think different for charity.
Kristof Van Brussel
Founder
iDonAid
iDonAid
an idea is to sell a lot of an unique application, also with 'levels' that one can buy within the application. with a lot of turnover, profit will be high. form the profit, an certain percentage can be reserved for the 'good goal'.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenso instead of 'giving': 'buying'.
because also: giving makes dependently. buying stimulates delivering products and services. a much more durable paradigm....